The rugby world is abuzz with a controversial twist! Former Springboks star Steven Kitshoff has expressed his dismay over Ardie Savea's alleged involvement in the shocking dismissal of Scott Robertson as All Blacks coach. But is it fair to blame Savea?
The story unfolds with the recent sacking of Crusaders icon Robertson, triggered by rumors of a player mutiny. Savea, the 2023 World Rugby Player of the Year, found himself at the center of this drama.
The New Zealand Herald reported that Savea threatened to reconsider his All Blacks commitment if changes weren't implemented after a disappointing 2024-2025 season under Robertson's leadership. However, New Zealand Rugby chair David Kirk refuted any player uprising, and Savea has remained silent on the matter.
Kitshoff, a seasoned forward, was visibly upset by the allegations. He asserted that if Savea were indeed guilty, he wouldn't be chosen by coach Rassie Erasmus. Kitshoff's frustration is understandable, but is it justified?
In a revealing podcast interview, Kitshoff shared his perspective: 'Rassie would say, "If a player acts out, I won't select them, regardless of their talent." We pick the right players, not just the best.'
But here's where it gets controversial. Kitshoff continued, 'Ardie's actions were inappropriate. Is he implying he's indispensable? I'm ranting, but this article left a sour taste.'
He added, 'I might have misunderstood, but it's hard to accept. Players are chosen for a role. What happened to Jake White is a prime example—he was ousted by the players.'
Kitshoff believes Robertson would have turned things around, and Savea should have taken responsibility. 'If Ardie had owned his part and vowed to change, I'd have respected that,' he said.
Despite the apparent unrest under Robertson, Savea was still chosen as skipper when Scott Barrett was unavailable. Kitshoff questioned this decision, suggesting it contradicted any alleged tension.
Robertson's appointment was based on merit, as Kitshoff noted. 'A coach isn't chosen randomly. Robertson earned his role with his credentials and familiarity with the squad.'
But the real controversy lies in Savea's alleged ultimatum. 'One player's public threat to leave if the coach isn't fired shows a lack of patriotism,' Kitshoff argued.
And this is the part most people miss: Should a player's loyalty be questioned for seeking change? Is it blackmail or a valid concern? Share your thoughts in the comments!
